Intervention Priority Chart
From Van Tiem, Moseley, and Dessinger (2012). Reprinted with permission.
Directions: After reflection, select six interventions that you believe to be the most feasible solutions for the identified performance gap and cause. Enter the name of the intervention next to the priority number that you would assign to the intervention (6 = highest priority to 1 = lowest priority). If you select fewer than six interventions, you should still begin with six and leave the lower numbers blank. (See the example below.)
After you have prioritized the interventions use Column 3 to briefly describe each intervention in your own words.
Priority (6 to 1) |
Intervention |
Personal Description of Intervention |
6 (example) |
Coaching |
Readily available resource person to help employees with initial usage. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference
Van Tiem, D. M., Moseley, J. L., & Dessinger, J. C. (2012). Fundamentals of performance improvement: Optimizing results through people, process, and organizations (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Field of study:
No answers yet