(1) Identify the documentary you have selected and your reason(s) for selecting it.
(2) Describe the key themes and core arguments advanced in the documentary (e.g. how is the harm in question defined and framed? what types of claims are made about this problem or issue?), and the techniques used by the filmmaker to communicate these themes (e.g. what types of presentation formats and storytelling devices are used in the film?).
(3) Discuss the connections between the film and the concepts and themes examined in the first eight weeks of the course (e.g. does the film address or illustrate, whether directly or indirectly, any of the barriers to the knowledgeability of corporate harm that we discussed? does the film support one or more of the causal frameworks examined in the course?).
(4) Provide an overall evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the documentary and comment on its significance in raising public awareness regarding the harm in question and potentially affecting social change.
In conducting your analysis, you must draw from and incorporate at leastthree academic sources selected from the course readings and at leastthree from your own outside research. These sources can be used in any of the four sections, although they will likely be most helpful in discussing connections to course themes (section #3), and evaluating the strengths and limitations of the film including the validity of its claims and the extent to which they are supported by the available research literature (section #4). In citing these sources, please use the referencing guidelines outlined below. A formal bibliography is required for this assignment. It is also imperative that you carefully proof-read your paper as marks will be deducted for both spelling and grammatical errors, as well as awkward and/or unclear sentences.