MPH/530 Wk 5 Discussion - Understanding Bias and Confounding

Wk 5 Discussion - Understanding Bias and Confounding [due Thurs]

 

Discussion Topic

Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member.

 

Due Thursday

Select and read 1 case study below. Then, respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

  • Where was the study at risk for bias, confounding, and/or validity threats such as low compliance and lack of baseline comparability?
  • As a public health researcher, what steps would you take to mitigate each potential research study problem?
  • What is the impact of biased responses on your study? How would you mitigate these risks?

 

Include the reference used to write your response. The reference MUST be cited within your post.

 

Field of study: 
Date Due: 
Monday, May 6, 2024

Answer

Wk 5 Discussion - Understanding Bias and Confounding

Purchase this answer to view and download it immediately
Money Back Guarantee